We’ve Moved! To Contentandsocial.com

I’ve moved this blog to my new firm, Content & Social. You can find my future posts at SocialMediaToday, where I’m a featured blogger, or at contentandsocial.com.

And think of us when you have projects or other needs for content and social media strategy and production. We specialize in B2B clients who want to leverage their “owned” media into more “earned” connections with customers through social networks.

I can be reached at rohnjay@contentandsocial.com

If you’ve linked to one of the articles here, that link will remain in place and i’ll cross index this domain with the new contentandsocial.com domain.

Thanks, and good luck in 2012–RJ

Comments are closed

“Black Wednesday” Turns Back SOPA

 

Yesterday was yet another milestone in the development of social networks as a political force.

After an enormous online backlash against the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) elected officials in Washington DC scrambled to abandon their support for SOPA, which had been heavily supported by the entertainment industry and old media companies like News Corp.

A key defector was Senator Marco Rubio, a rising star in the Republican Party, who is at the top of the list of potential vice-presidential running mates with likely nominee Mitt Romney. Rubio was actually one of the sponsors of SOPA, and on the day that leading Websites like Wikipedia and Social Media today went dark, and Google covered itself in a black box, Rubio hit the ground running on Wednesday, announcing his change of heart at an early morning press conference. (See the NY Times article for more)

He was joined at 9am by Senator John Cornyn, a fellow Republican from Texas, who chairs the party’s campaign operations.  Cornyn’s defection was the official signal to the rank and file that SOPA in its current form is dead.  A huge number of elected officials had signed on in support of SOPA which was viewed as an obscure piece of copyright legislation being passed to help the entertainment industry (which, it should be noted, is a significant source of campaign contributions and endorsements.)  When the backlash hit—culminated by “Black Wednesday,” they were stunned.  And the smart ones–like Rubio–got out in front of the crowd by quickly turning against SOPA.

Former Senator Chris Dodd is now a lobbyist for News Corp and other entertainment companies and he released a statement calling blackouts like Wikipedia’s: “stunts that punish their users or turn them into their corporate pawns, rather than coming to the table to find solutions to a problem that all now seem to agree is very real and damaging,”

Curiously quiet were tech-savvy representatives like Senator Al Franken from Minnesota who is listed as one of the sponsors of the Senate version of SOPA.   It’s clear that official Washington was caught short by the breadth and depth of the opposition to SOPA from Internet users.

This battle is between old media—the entertainment industry as it grew up in the 20th century—and new media in the form of the Internet.  The battle lines include specific problems like piracy of movies and music over the Internet and from piracy overseas.  But at the heart of the battle lies copyright law as it is currently written which is in no way capable of dealing with the Internet.

Silicon Valley law firms like Wilson Sonsini, who represents clients like Google, have made good money from their expertise in both the new and the old worlds of media that copyright is being stretched between.  They will be key arbiters with old media lobbyists like Dodd, as elected officials in Washington try keep campaign contributions from Disney and News Corp rolling in without pissing off most of the people who use the Internet, which is, well….pretty much everyone now.

But fundamentally some revisions in copyright law will have to be made to account for the new user models and the total lack of traditional choke points on the Internet.  You simply can’t stop peer to peer sharing in a world of social networks where everyone is a publisher.

Just ask all those former Presidents in the Arab World.

 

Rohn Jay Miller is CEO of Content + Social, a design and strategic firm in Minneapolis.  

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
Comments are closed

I Had A Dream And It Was All About How To Change Marketing

 

Tom Disch was my creative writing teacher at the University of Minnesota, a long time ago.  Disch went on to write acclaimed futurist novels like 334, and On Wings of Song.  At the time he was a struggling science fiction author, having just left a crummy job as a copywriter for an ad agency in New York.  I was a 19 year old knucklehead wearing John Lennon glasses who thought he was going to be a novelist.  What did I know?

In that semester’s course, Creative Writing 1-101, Tom said we could write any damn story we wanted, except he had two rules: no weather and no dreams.

Today I think those are pretty good rules, as was the other piece of advice from him I recall, that as much as possible we should “stick to simple, declarative sentences.”

I’m Sorry Mr. Disch.

This post is the story of a dream I had the other night.  I hope you’ll excuse me, Mr. Disch– because it’s not fiction.  It’s the true recounting of an actual, magical dream I had.

Tom Disch

The dream takes place in the present day at LBi US in New York City, where I worked for four years starting in 2006.

It’s Friday afternoon and I’m in the middle of a crowd old friends in the huge conference room on the 9th floor of the Puck Building in Soho.  It’s the Friday afternoon beer bust, and the large conference room is crowded, with more and more people coming in.

I live in Minneapolis now, and in this dream I’ve been invited back to give a talk about my recent work.  Apparently I’ve published a book about marketing and it’s put me on the conference speaking circuit.   But this is a friendly gathering of lots of old comrades.  As I move through the crowd I’m stopped by friends along the way and we hug.  The room is filled with the din of chatter, and now and then there is laughter.

I see Cathy Chan, a peer of mine, who is the organizer of this Friday afternoon talk series.  She’s wearing a black dress and that silver medallion necklace of hers.  She smiles and asks, “Are you all set? We should get going.”  I smile and say something, and she leads me to one end of the conference room where there is a low stage and a microphone in front of a row of whiteboards on the wall.

I walk up to the microphone, and some people begin to turn to listen.  I see my old boss Tom Nicholson smile and indicate with his hands that we should talk after my speech.

As I look out over the crowd I suddenly realize I have no idea what I’m going to talk about.

I’m totally blank.  I’m breathing hard, my eyes glaze, and I panic. (This is I think a version of the old dream that you’re taking an exam and you realize that you haven’t studied all semester.)  I think quickly. I look to my right and see people crowding into the room.  I have to buy some time.  I lean into the microphone and say:

“I see there’re more people coming, so we’re going to wait a few minutes till everyone’s in, thanks.”

And I step down from the stage, into the crowd.   I’m in a cold sweat.  What a fraud I am.  I press my way in between people, and as I do I look down and see something amazing.

It’s a little piece of paper, a torn corner of something.  It’s silvery, and illuminated from inside so it’s slightly glowing and shining.  I bend down to pick it up.  I look at it, and then I see another scrap a few inches away.  As I pick the second piece up I see a third, and then I realize what they are.  These are torn pieces of a sheet of memo paper of the outline of my speech.   I’d written them on airplane flight coming in.

I’m saved! Flushed with relief, my mind now recalls everything about what I had written, and I walk along picking up the little pieces of glowing silver memo paper until I have them all.  I stand beside the stage and push them together.

In crude pen I have written:

  • DRIVE DEEPER INTO THE PRODUCT.
  • BRAND DESIGN = PRODUCT DESIGN
  • PLANNING COMES FROM THE PRODUCT DESIGN
  • BUILD AND ITERATE

I remember now!  I remember what I meant to say.   I’m ready, I totally get it, and now I’m ready to throw it down.

I step back up onto the stage and I notice everything: ceiling fans,  large sheets of brainstorming paper stuck to the side wall.  I see some friends in the mass of faces.   I see Ann Nielsen, and she smiles and gives a wave.  As I approach the microphone I shove the silver pieces of memo paper into my coat jacket pocket.  People turn and begin to quiet down, some are saying “Shh.”  The microphone is a large announcer’s mike, styled like ones from the 1940s.  I look down at it.  With every breath more confidence and eagerness fills my body.

I look up and smile.

And just as I was about to begin….my alarm clock went off.

I swear.

I was jerked awake.  I was in the guest bedroom because I had a cold and my wife was waking up very early to get into work.  Reaching for my iPhone, I found the Notes app and starting writing as fast as my thumbs could move.  I laughed, and thought “maybe it’s an effective dream,” like poor George Orr in The Lathe of Heaven.

Those notes are the silvery gossamer of this blog post.

John Cleese, of Monty Python fame, has become a serious student of dreaming.  He’s convinced that if you’re working on a problem and you leave it at the end of the day, then go to sleep, when you wake up the solution will be obvious to you.  He claims this is the key to all the great comedy he’s written (including my favorite Python, the Dead Parrot sketch.)  Maybe that’s true, at least once and awhile.  It might be a good practice to try, eh?

I think what I meant in my dream about “driving deeper into the product” is that the answers to marketing and sales problems are found at the heart of the products and services we sell.  We often get lost in all the silly tin foil and Christmas lights we drape around a product, that stuff we call branding.

Examples: people loved the Saab because of its design, not the commercials that Saab ran, and now we mourn Saab’s passing.  UnderArmour makes better base layer clothing for winter than anything else I’ve worn, and I love the stark, black design of it.  I wear Warby Parker glasses because I love the retro look, they cost $99 and they donate a second pair to someone who can’t afford new glasses–great on all points!

Here’s another: I drink Starbucks French Roast coffee at home because the taste is unbelievably delicious.  I’m surprised frankly, because I don’t particularly care for Starbuck’s–I don’t like the stores, nor their barristas, their grande non-fat lattes, not even the damn mermaid logo.  Starbucks is like the 21st century McDonalds to me.  But there you go.  I love the coffee beans, not the bag they come in.  Today product design is 80% or 90% of the matter, and advertising and trade dress is 10%.  That’s used to be different, but in this century it’s all changed, and I think for the good.

I’m fascinated by the idea of building services for customers as a form of marketing.  Let’s take all the money spent on the annoying radio advertising (the worst, most irritating form in my booklet) and let’s spend it on something useful for the customer, something that says something about our values, design philosophy, and our product.  People will use it and it will make them love our product even more.

That’s why I love, love, love the Dyson hand dryer, the Dyson Blade.  It’s the best ad I’ve seen for a Dyson vacuum cleaner (which by the way is the workhorse vacuum cleaner of choice in the Miller household.)  From the moment you stick your wet, dripping hands into a Dyson Blade you totally get what Dyson is about as a company.  This works 10X better than those little white boxes on washroom walls that ineffectually breathe warm air for a few moments and then die.  This is a hand dryer!

And with subtle grace Dyson connects the hand dryer to their big product line, the vacuum cleaners, by using the same soft silver/grey finish with bright gold/yellow trim.

They should hang a sign over every Dyson Blade that says, “If you like how we dry your hands, you’ll love how we clean your floors!”

My father was a salesman for IBM for much of his career.  He left me a small IBM notepad, which I carry around in my coat pocket.  On the inside front cover are written the IBM company values:

  • Dedication to every client’ success
  • Innovation that matters—for our company, and for the world
  • Trust and personal responsibility in all relationships

Is that grand?  Clear, high standards for making decisions.

IBM has lost its way from time to time, most notably when the era of “big iron” mainframes was disrupted and devastated by the rise of the PC in the 1990s.  But with the help of great managers (including Lou Gerstner, but also many others) it’s remained the most relevant business computing partner a corporation could choose.  Today they are maybe the best example of a social enterprise working to make every client successful.  I think they’re great at creating innovation that matters.

It’s not the IBM logo, or their commercials that sell IBM— it’s leadership in the marketplace on behalf of their clients.

Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM” is a mantra of folk wisdom made up by customers long ago–and not by IBM.  Think about that.   Would your customers say that about your company?

As marketers we get stuck on being marketers.  We’re people who make marketing deliverables like marketing plans, market research reports, and social media plans.  We build advertising campaign briefs, and broadcast flight plans, and so on.  Now we fight for control of online, mobile and social strategy–but why?  So we can create more deliverables to our bosses that will prove we’re being great marketers.  We write stuff like power points and Brand Lift reports, PR media mention reports and Golden Lion awards, and….  We create the deliverables we created last year, and we try to make them a little better.

Farrah Bostic said in a presentation at Planningness this year that as planners, as marketers of any description, the hardest thing for us do is give up making our deliverables.  How will anyone know I’m great if they don’t see my brilliance in my strategic plan?

Of course, that’s about me, not the client.  And this has be about the client, and most of all about the client’s product.

Real “brand equity” is grown and is sustained by customers finding ways to bring a product into their lives in a valuable way over a long time.  Marketers, sales people, product designers and CEOs all have a collective obligation to deliver the greatest value in their products.  That’s the first thing, and that’s the last thing.

We can use marketing as a framework to explain the product to the customer so they understand and are reminded why its valuable, and why they’re part of the group of people who use that product—Starbuck’s people, or Mini-Cooper people, or Guinness drinkers?) But we can also break away from marketing as we understand it and join with people across the company to figure out new ways of proving to the customer what our products do and how they can be valuable.

I just wrote a column about how Coca-Cola did that in Portugal.  So if people who sell sugared water can do it, I think almost any good product can.

Adrian Ho tells the story of when he led account planning at Fallon and they worked on for United Airlines.  United was in a terrible slump, but working with Fallon they repositioned themselves as the best airline for the business traveler.  The results were amazing, and United made a major financial turn-around.  The result? They were very grateful to Fallon and Adrian’s team and all the tremendous work they had done capturing the imagination of the business traveler and allowing United to focus on serving them well.

But United cut Fallon’s budget completely the following year.  Why?  They needed to spend the money on renovating the interiors of the airplanes—replacing the seats with better ones, re-doing everything inside the airplane.  And that was more important to United than more great advertising.

What’s the lesson?  It’s about driving deeper into the product—don’t be satisfied with building incremental versions of what you did last year.   Think about your customer, not your role. Innovate. Think of services, content and other valuable ways we can help the customer.  These new valuable ways have to extend from the core values of our company and therefore from the design values of our products and services.  Without that “true north,” we’ll just keep lathering on crappy ads with weasel words and clever animations, and we’ll “spray and pray” our marketing budget as best we can.

And if these new forms of marketing/customer service look more like a product extensions than a marketing campaigns, that’s fine.  Break down the silos.  Built and iterate.  Social media is integrating good products and services deeper into the lives of customers, and if you look closely you’ll see some brands are growing stronger identities, built on value and expressed in valuable exchanges with customers.

That’s how you build and sustain a brand.

That’s my speech, more or less.  So thanks for inviting me.  It’s so great to see friends I’ve worked all those long nights with.  Hey, I think I could use a glass of water now. Thank you very much.

Oh, and I’m sorry Mr. Disch. I apologize for the dream sequence.  I was sleeping when I wrote this.

And then I woke up.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
Comments are closed

Coke’s Fantastic Social “Un-commercial” Rewards Honesty

 

 

Coca-Cola Portugal’s team came up with a brilliant social experiment that it conducted last month in Lisbon, and it’s a brilliant example of how “social” isn’t defined by Facebook and Twitter, it’s defined by people.

A soccer match was coming up between the two biggest teams in Lisbon, arch-rivals Sport Lisboa and Sporting clube del Portugal.  Obviously tickets were at an absolute premium and almost impossible to get.

The Coke team planted a wallet in a busy shopping center with a hidden camera.  In the wallet was $200 and sticking out of the wallet was a ticket to the soccer match.

How many people took the ticket?  Or the money?  Or both?

The answer is that 95% of the people who found the wallet checked inside for identification, saw the money and the ticket—and turned the wallet in with both the money and the ticket.

Though all these good people probably expected nothing in return, Coke gave them a splendid reward: they each received a ticket to the soccer game of their own, courtesy of Coke.

They sat in their own section during the game.  At halftime the video of what happened in the store (in Portuguese) ran on the stadium’s video screen and the good Samaritans were given a standing ovation by the crowd.

How’s that for “feel good” social marketing?

There’s a lot to like in this idea, and frankly almost any company could have gotten great props for running it.  But what I love is that it re-enforces the major values of the Coke brand.

Coke is all about fun and enjoying life.  What better way to express this than to tap into how good we feel about the community we’re part of?  And into our passion for fun?  The same experiment without the soccer ticket doesn’t work nearly as well.  By making it about the soccer ticket Coke had people laughing along from the first second of this video.

It wouldn’t have been unreasonable to expect half of the people to return the wallet with the money, but keep the soccer ticket.  Playing off the mischevous fun of spying on our fellow soccer fans, seeing their reactions when they realize what the ticket is for—and then to see them turn this precious ticket in.  Well, that makes the story-telling itself so fun.

Without the soccer ticket we would have been cringing and uncomfortable from the begining.  The soccer ticket made it fun.  And Coke joyously finished the story off by sharing the store video with the crowd at the game.  In this video we get to see the experiment, the fun of surprising the people who returned the wallet, and the joy of them being recognized by the soccer game audience.

I think examples of “brand alligned” out of the box marketing like this remind us that there’s more to social media than social networks.  More broadly it’s about how we share information socially, and that includes face to face.

Oh, and this story did pretty well on social networks too,  especially in Portugal.  The last time I checked more than 200,000 people had visited the Portuguese language version on the Coca-Cola Portugal channel on You Tube.

Enjoy:

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
Comments { 0 }

Five Questions Klout Can’t Answer

 

 

Before moving on to more pressing issues in social media—like Google+, Facebook and the emerging Social Enterprise, just to name a few—let me nail to the wall this one final post about the disaster called Klout.

After I wrote my initial post “Delete Your Klout Profile Now,” last week I offered up a dozen questions and an open mike to Klout CEO Joe Fernandez (“Klout CEO Responds to Critics”) which he graciously stepped up to.

Except, well, Joe didn’t really answer the big questions that were asked of him by myself and many other bloggers after revelations that Klout was tracking friends from Facebook with private profiles, sweeping up minors and publishing Klout scores on them, and generally prevaricating about the real purpose of Klout and how it deals with the clients who pay the bills—advertisers like Chevy and Virgin.

Here are five questions that remain unanswered by Fernandez and Klout.  And I don’t expect clear, accountable answers on any of them any time soon:

1. What is the precise number of profiles Klout has in its systems of people who have never registered with Klout or opt-ed in to Klout in any way?  And are you deleting  these “unrequested” profiles from your database?

Klout sweeps the Internet for public social media messages—right now that’s from Facebook and Twitter.  (They also will allow people who register to add links to their LinkedIn and Google+ accounts.)  Klout claimed in September to have more than 100 million profiles.  How many of these are people who never registered at Klout, and never asked for a Klout score?

This is an easy question to answer (subtract total profiles from total registered profiles) but not easy to make public.  If Klout admits that 90 million of the 100 million accounts are people who never asked to be rated by Klout, privacy issues here and in the European Union become a very public issue.  Klout doesn’t want to talk about who’s in their database and how they got there.

Think of Klout as “anti-social media.”  It’s not about sharing and building organic networks of relationships using social media.  It’s turning social media into a popularity contest, claiming a Google-like right to mysteriously—and publicly— rank your “influence.”  They might succeed at this if they go unchallenged as they amass information and use it for a proprietary public ranking.  They’re aiming to define and own a space called “public social influence ranking.”  But their lack of transparency and  accountability in publishing public rankings of people who largely haven’t opted-in will be their un-doing.

2. How many minors under the age of 18 have Klout profiles?  How many under the age of 13?

Klout can’t answer this one because there’s no way to automatically identify these profiles.  There are still underage kids getting Klout scores and being identified as experts with “social influence.”

Fernandez’ answer was mush mouthed political candidate-speak:

“This is a challenge that every company doing business on the social web faces. We work closely with the platforms and their trust and security teams to share insights and best practices. I think there is also a role we can play here in helping parents understand how data is spread on the social web so they can be more informed about what their kids are doing.”

In other words, “we don’t know, but  that’s really a problem for parents, not us.”

3. How can anyone trust Klout scores when you keep your algorithms secret and you won’t allow an independent third party to audit their accuracy?  How can you claim transparency when you’re not transparent? 

These people want to be “the standard for influence.”  Everyone from the Gallup Poll to Neilsen to the American Bureau of Circulation provides clear, unambiguous information about their processes for polling and reporting and the raw data used to compute the results.   There’s a dozen ways to game the system and there’s no discussion about how Klout proposes to police the “black hat” and “grey hat” tools and techniques to goose your Klout score.

4. What’s the specific number of people who have opted out and deleted their Klout profiles? 

Joe won’t answer this other than to say “it’s less than .01% of all profiles.” So there’s no hard numbers.  But note how he answered the question.  Klout has developed profiles on 100 million people, mostly using public data and without their knowledge and opt-in permission.

As small as .01% is, out of 100 million profiles that still would represent 10,000 people who have deleted their profiles since November 1st, and I think it would be a reasonable guess that most of those came after the fusillade of articles and blog posts in the middle of the month.

Klout could be losing 10,000+ profiles a month—and among the most active people in social media.  A study by Cornell University and Yahoo in March 2011 pointed out that 50% of all tweets on Twitter are sent by just 20,000 people.  Think about those numbers for a moment.  Even if the Cornell-Yahoo study is wrong by a factor of 10, that still means a few hundred thousand people make up the majority of tweets on Twitter.   How many of these “super users” are among the 100,000 or so who have deleted their profiles?  That specific question goes unanswered.

5. Why is Klout hiding the “delete your profile” option so that it can’t be found? 

There are only three hidden ways to delete your profile on Klout.  The easiest is to follow this path:

  1. Log in.  If you don’t have an opt-in account, you’ll have to create one using your Twitter or Facebook profile.
  2. Go to”profile settings.”
  3. Scroll to the bottom of the page, which is hidden below the fold.  You’ll see these words: “Klout values your privacy. Click here to learn more.”  Click on that link.
  4. You’ll arrive at the “Privacy Policy,” which is three screens of boilerplate privacy verbiage 1,259 words long.  At the very, very, very end of the Privacy Policy it says: “If you are not a Klout user and wish to opt out of Klout, please click here.”
  5. You’ll finally arrive at a three page dialogue to delete your profile. 

A second way: In the footer, under the heading “KLOUT FOR DEVELOPERS,” click on “Privacy,”  and you’ll go to step “4.” above.  (“Developers?”  Why only “Developers?” unless you’re deliberately trying to make the link hard to find?)

The third way: In the “Help” section, under “Your account” there are five help articles and then a link to “more.”  None of the five articles are about how to delete your account.  If you think to click on the “more” link you’ll come to a page of ten help articles, again none about deleting your account.  Finally if you click on page “2” you’ll see the final three articles, one of which is about deleting your account.

Tricky, huh?

By contrast, to delete your Facebook account you go to Home / Account Settings / Security and there is a clear link at the top of the page that says: “Deactivate your account.”

My point is if you brought 100 users to the Klout home page for a usability test and gave them the task to delete their account, I bet 90+ wouldn’t figure out how.

It’s this kind of sneaky behavior plus the weasel words that undermine any message Joe Fernandez and Klout are trying to send about transparency and authenticity.

Ugh, Enough! 

It’s time to get back to work.  I’ve got better things to do.

Going forward Klout will or will not implode as the forces of economics (and Google, I expect) work in the marketplace.

I truly hope Klout goes away, but maybe it won’t—maybe Kleiner Perkins will get their $100 million paydaywhen Klout is sold.   Who knows?

But if you can’t figure out how to delete your Klout profile, then do yourself (and all of us) a favor and please, please at least ignore Klout.

Go out and engage with interesting people on social networks and give out more than you receive.  Try to help build communities, and make them better and more valuable to everyone.

You don’t need no stinking Klout score to tell you if you’re doing the right thing in social media.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Comments { 0 }

Switch to our mobile site